Hi Thomas, hi all,
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > did anyone of you ever saw some strange problems with large objects and
> > the postgresql 6.51?
>
> I don't work with Large Objects, but I am pretty sure that the
> behavior was changed/fixed for v6.5 to *require* all large object
> manipulation to happen within a transaction. This was always a
> requirement, but Postgres did not enforce it and had some potentially
> bad behavior lurking as a result.
Have many thanks for that fast answer. It is new to me, that
large-object-operations requires transactions. Did I read the manual to
fast or isn't it written down there?
I will try it.
Wolfgang
