Jeff Hoffmann wrote:
> on a related note, i've been thinking about trying out postgres on NT,
> but i've been hesitant to do so because it seems to be a "just because i
> can" port -- maybe not as stable or fast as on a unix system, but neat
> to have. are people actually using it for serious (ie, it needs to be
> reliable but not necessarily mission critical) work?
Hi, Jeff,
I know Postgres on NT is not as stable as on a UN*X system so far.
Some friends of mine works on NT platform, they just want to learn SQL,
but you know, almost databases on NT are commercial, they are expensive
and they cannot pay it just because they want to learn SQL, right?
Now they can run PostgreSQL on NT, and study more fun :-)
Becuase Postgres is *free* and *open source*, so that's why I port
PostgreSQL to NT.
> jeff
-- `""""""'
Kevin Lo "Use the Internet to | |
kevlo@wahoo.com.tw it's fullest potential" OO--)|
kevlo@FreeBSD.org \__ (_ |
kevlo@kde.org /\ |____|
http://www.freebsd.org/~kevlo (=(_>< \
