Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Vadim Mikheev
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
Date
Msg-id 37F083E2.5C40D897@krs.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Latest tree  ("Ansley, Michael" <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>)
Responses Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-interfaces
"Ansley, Michael" wrote:
> 
> Hi, all,
> 
> Whoever is doing the SSL stuff:
> In postmaster.c, at lines 995, and 1841, there is code that is not wrapped
> in the USE_SSL define.
> 
> Last night I checked out the latest source, and couldn't get it to compile.
> It seems that the function heap_openr() has a new parameter, and there are
> calls that have not been updated yet.  I was a little hesitant to go adding
> stuff, as the new parameter is a LOCKTYPE, and I wouldn't know what locks
> are required where, so I just left well alone.  Any comments on this?  There
> is another function which is paired up with it, but I forget the name, which
> also has a new parameter, it seems, and also has calls which have not yet
> been updated.

I fixed all this yesterday while committing my WAL changes...

Vadim


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: "Ansley, Michael"
Date:
Subject: Latest tree
Next
From: "ciprut ethan"
Date:
Subject: