Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Sorry, guys. Here is the ultimate patch which keeps the entire
> > behavior as it was, apart from forbidding minus-terminated
> > operators. Seems that I have to break the habit of doing before
> > thinking properly :-/ The point is that my second patch breaks
> > constructs like a & b or a ! b. This patch is to be applied
> > instead of any of two other today's patches.
> >
>
> Applied.
Hey! Later discussion on that matter made us think that minus-terminated
operators have to be preserved, especially considering
that there is already one such operator here: geometric ?-.
I'm terribly sorry, but that patch shouldn't be applied.
The other patch applied by you which exterminates uminus exclusive
state in parser is considered to be ok.
--
Leon.
-------
He knows he'll never have to answer for any of his theories actually
being put to test. If they were, they would be contaminated by reality.
