Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions
Date
Msg-id 37EA2C02.C0759C88@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > It looks to me like '^' and '|' have been left out of the alternatives
> > for MathOp in src/backend/parser/gram.y.  It could be they were
> > deliberately omitted, but I bet it's just an oversight.
> OK, here is a patch to allow both ^ and | as operators, both in operator
> definitions and expressions. It seems to work for me. Unfortunately the
> regression tests do not tell me an awful lot, as several of them fail on
> the Alpha anyway. As I don;t really know what I'm doing, I'd appreciate
> it if somebody else could check the patch out and let me know whether it
> is ok.

It's fine as far as it goes, but istm that there are other cases
missing from gram.y also :(

Bruce, how did this stuff get into the stable release? Looks like we
are going to need a v6.5.3 Real Soon Now. And packagers, we should
plan on having a patch for v6.5.2. I'll try coming up with one in the
next couple of days; I've tested on my own gram.y but it has too many
other changes to be used as-is.
                   - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Horak Daniel
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current tree s
Next
From: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another RI question