Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2]
Date
Msg-id 37E7A27B.6BF226AD@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2]  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > Or have the createdb command run 'man createdb' *grin*
> I was thinking:
>         See the CREATE DATABASE command for more options.

I can't help thinking that this thread is trying to solve a problem
that isn't a problem. createdb works fine. You can do more from within
sql. So what? Someone could, if they thought it was a problem, add
more capabilities to createdb, and an admin could choose to use it or
not.

Seems to me that it works just fine for most cases right now; sure
does for me...
                     - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Referential Integrity In PostgreSQL
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postmaster disappears