Re: [HACKERS] Status report: long-query-string changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Leon
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Status report: long-query-string changes
Date
Msg-id 37DD0B37.E8F8F931@udmnet.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Status report: long-query-string changes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> 
> > The solution is obvious - to eliminate exclusive states entirely!
> > Banzai!!!
> 
> That will complicate the lexer, and make it more brittle and difficult
> to read, since you will have to, essentially, implement the exclusive
> states using flags within each element.
> 
> If you want to try it as an exercise, we *might* find it isn't as ugly
> as I am afraid it will be, but...
> 

Gimme the latest lexer source. (I pay for my Internet on a per 
minute basis, so I can't connect to CVS) You will see what I mean.

-- 
Leon.
-------
He knows he'll never have to answer for any of his theories actually 
being put to test. If they were, they would be contaminated by reality.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Status report: long-query-string changes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump table order