Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: procost for to_tsvector - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: procost for to_tsvector
Date
Msg-id 37907.1430503175@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: procost for to_tsvector  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: procost for to_tsvector  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> In the OP, he suggested "on the order of 100".  Maybe we could just go with 100.

I'm OK with that in view of <87h9trs0zm.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk> and
some experiments of my own, but I wonder why we are only thinking of
to_tsvector.  Isn't to_tsquery, for example, just about as expensive?
What of other text search functions?
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: feature freeze and beta schedule
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Manipulating complex types as non-contiguous structures in-memory