Re: [HACKERS] Severe SUBSELECT bug in 6.5 CVS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chris Bitmead
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Severe SUBSELECT bug in 6.5 CVS
Date
Msg-id 37780A8C.38C5176B@ozemail.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Severe SUBSELECT bug in 6.5 CVS  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:

> >     Informix-SE
> >     Oracle8
> >
> > and both of them return 0 rows, like PostgreSQL.
> >
> 
> Yes, this is how I remembered Informix doing it.  
> Returning a NULL in
> the subselect does not match anything, so hopefully we 
> don't have a bug.

What is the general policy? Follow the SQL standard, or do what all the
other databases do?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hub.Org News Admin"
Date:
Subject: ...
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Perl library (was Building Postgres)