Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs
Date
Msg-id 3776805.1738337624@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I don't really know what to do about the "IO" abbreviation. The other sections
> un-abbreviate abbreviations, but I suspect that Input/Output will be less
> informative than IO to most...

I'd lean towards writing "I/O", but it's not a point I'd quibble over.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other