Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?
Date
Msg-id 376741.1595599613@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Well, I think the comments could be more clear - for the insert case
> specifically - about which cases you think are and are not safe.

Yeah, the proposed comment changes don't actually add much.  Also
please try to avoid inserting non-ASCII   into the source code;
at least in my mail reader, that attachment has some.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?
Next
From: Chris Travers
Date:
Subject: Re: Making CASE error handling less surprising