Re: Real Programmers (was: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vadim Mikheev
Subject Re: Real Programmers (was: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6)
Date
Msg-id 375FC385.89F5B5CF@krs.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Real Programmers (was: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6)  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Responses Re: Real Programmers (was: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6)  (A James Lewis <james@fsck.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jan Wieck wrote:
> 
> > Actually, I just don't think that breaks in loops are always better
> > than gotos.
> >
> > >     Vadim  is  surely one of the real programmers in our project.
> > >     It's not only that he isn't  afraid  using  GOTO's.  He  also
> >
> > Like someone didn't afraid to use siglongjmp in elog.c.
> 
>     There  are  much  better  ones in the PL handlers! memcpy()'s
>     mangling sigjmp_buf's between sigsetjmp() siglongjmp() stuff.

Wow! Voodoo!
I very like such things -:)
This is really the way what Real Programmers follow -:)

Vadim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] transaction rollbacks on error
Next
From: Daniel Kalchev
Date:
Subject: another locale problem