Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused
Date
Msg-id 372.937604861@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused]
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> More importantly, though, any bugs in the Makefile or
>> whatever will be noticed early by developers and won't wait until the
>> last moment.  Since the basic installation scheme likely doesn't
>> depend much on the exact pgaccess release, there really isn't much to
>> be lost by keeping it in the development tree.

> It is in the development tree, just not the most recent version.

But the point is, if the most recent version had been in the development
tree, we'd have had a better shot at noticing that its makefile was
missing...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: attdisbursiont
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused]