Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Date
Msg-id 3715.1130164668@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance  ("Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
List pgsql-hackers
"Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com> writes:
> 3.  A pl/pgsql function stuck in a empty loop is unkillable except by
> killing the process on the server, which cycles the entire server.  This
> was the behavior before the patch, btw.

Hmm, that suggests we need another CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS somewhere in
plpgsql.  Please show the exact test case you were using.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about Ctrl-C and less
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance