RE: ? potential bug in LockBuffer ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mikheev, Vadim
Subject RE: ? potential bug in LockBuffer ?
Date
Msg-id 3705826352029646A3E91C53F7189E32016647@sectorbase2.sectorbase.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to ? potential bug in LockBuffer ?  ("Mauricio Breternitz" <mbjsql@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>                         (buf->r_locks)--;
>                         if (!buf->r_locks)
>                                 *buflock &= ~BL_R_LOCK;
> 
> 
> Or I am missing something...

buflock is per-backend flag, it's not in shmem. Backend is
allowed only single lock per buffer.

Vadim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: bpalmer
Date:
Subject: Re: Not released yet, but could someone take a quick peak ...
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: JDBC commit to 7.1.2