Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Jonah H. Harris
Subject Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch
Date
Msg-id 36e682920804021906x2af73d5cyeda277d7a16b4fdf@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-patches
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>  The fundamental problem I've got with this patch is that it adds 400K
>  of new code (and that's just the code, not counting documentation or
>  regression tests) that we'll have to maintain, to obtain a feature that
>  so far as I've heard there is precisely zero demand for.

We have a customer that wants to use it as part of a MySQL-to-Postgres
migration.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah.harris@enterprisedb.com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [8.4] Updated WITH clause patch (non-recursive)
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: psql command aliases support