On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can't to say so plpgpsm is an dialect of plpgsql. Minimally there
> are different parser. I am sure so supported functions can be shared,
> but it's mean really dramatic changes in plpgsql code. I belive so
> separated languages will be more maintainable.
I agree. I think it should be a separate language as well.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah.harris@enterprisedb.com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
