On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc> wrote:
> I tried using insert ... delete ... return ... and get a syntax error:
Yeah...
> In the past I've executed insert ... select and then the delete.
> However, I believe there is race condition here as the delete may see
> more or less rows than the insert ... select. I thought the above would
> be a clever PostgreSQL-8.3 alternative, but I'm either stupid or it
> doesn't work... :-)
Not stupid, it doesn't work :) This was a limitation of the original
design based on (IIRC) executor-related issues. I've seen about 6 or
so posts now about using DELETE returning in the same manner as you're
discussing, and I agree it would be quite useful. Unfortunately, with
the amount of changes required to make it work properly, no one has
wanted to pick that up and add it yet :(
Depending on what else I'm working on, I'd like to get this fixed for
8.4. Though, I'll probably be working on other, more important
projects.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah.harris@enterprisedb.com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
