Re: Including Snapshot Info with Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonah H. Harris
Subject Re: Including Snapshot Info with Indexes
Date
Msg-id 36e682920710130526y40866834o3f928df79075e8e5@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Including Snapshot Info with Indexes  ("Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/13/07, Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>       I went through this article and it was good. Please have a look at it.
>
> http://www.databasecolumn.com/2007/09/one-size-fits-all.html
>
> This article was written by Michael Stonebraker, considered to be the
> founder of our database. He has mentioned that the DBMS designed in 1970s
> haven't changed according to the change that has happened in Hardware
> landscape. The Vertica database(Monet is a open source version with the same
> principle) makes use of the very same principle. Use more disk space, since
> they are less costly and optimize the data warehousing.

Sorry, but quoting Stonebraker (who has a *financial* interest in his
statement), is pointless.  Similarly, you can't directly compare his
concepts to your case.

IMHO, you're trying to get buy-in.  In this group, unless you have a
patch that proves something, you're generally out of luck.  My
suggestion is to start coding.  You will find, as I did, that DSM is a
better solution.

-- 
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation                | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor          | jonah.harris@enterprisedb.com
Edison, NJ 08837                        | http://www.enterprisedb.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: Including Snapshot Info with Indexes
Next
From: SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH
Date:
Subject: Postgresql partitioning problems & suggested solutions