On 2/20/07, Rod Taylor <rod.taylor@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do 97% of transactions commit because Oracle has slow rollbacks and
> developers are working around that performance issue, or because they
> really commit?
Again, off-topic, but 97% of all transactions commit according to Jim
Gray and his research... not anything related to Oracle.
> I have watched several developers that would prefer to issue numerous
> selects to verify things like foreign keys in the application in
> order to avoid a rollback.
That's just bad development.
> Anyway, I don't have experience with big Oracle applications but I'm
> not so sure that 97% of transactions would commit if rollbacks were
> cheaper.
Again, stats not related to Oracle, but databases in general.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris@enterprisedb.com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
