Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME column - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonah H. Harris
Subject Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME column
Date
Msg-id 36e682920611170748m4116c876rb1a050a0beea4262@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME column  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/17/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> No, it should not, because that risks breaking other references to the
> sequence (eg, in user-written functions).  If the user is feeling that
> he wants consistency, he can rename the sequence himself and take
> responsibility for any side-effects on his code.

I concur.

-- 
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation            | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor            | jharris@enterprisedb.com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830            | http://www.enterprisedb.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME column
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] replication docs: split single vs.