On 8/27/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> My take on all this is that there's no one-size-fits-all replication
> solution, and therefore the right approach is to have multiple active
> subprojects.
Can't help but agree there. Maybe someday the subprojects will get
together and come up with a standard framework each of them could
use... but PGCluster, as good as it is, certainly doesn't address much
of the replication arena; primarily asynchronous replication for both
multimaster and master-slave.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris@enterprisedb.com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
