Re: pg_stat_database.xact_commit + pg_stat_database.xact_rollback asa reliable metric for xid consumption ? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Achilleas Mantzios
Subject Re: pg_stat_database.xact_commit + pg_stat_database.xact_rollback asa reliable metric for xid consumption ?
Date
Msg-id 36dd7ae2-7c6f-86af-430b-dd9a0f7774b3@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_database.xact_commit + pg_stat_database.xact_rollback asa reliable metric for xid consumption ?  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_database.xact_commit + pg_stat_database.xact_rollback asa reliable metric for xid consumption ?
List pgsql-admin
On 1/6/20 1:36 μ.μ., Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 12:02 PM Achilleas Mantzios
> <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> wrote:
> Because read only transaction usually don't consume an xid.  So yes
> pg_stat_database gives a more reasonable approximation of the real
> number of transactions happening on the server.
Thank you, so what would be the official way to monitor txid consumption (from a MVCC / Freezing admin POV)?
>
>


-- 
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt




pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_database.xact_commit + pg_stat_database.xact_rollback asa reliable metric for xid consumption ?
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_database.xact_commit + pg_stat_database.xact_rollback asa reliable metric for xid consumption ?