Re: [PATCH] Add hints for invalid binary encoding names in encode/decode functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: [PATCH] Add hints for invalid binary encoding names in encode/decode functions
Date
Msg-id 36EE762C-E3A9-4BB3-946D-EA76EDBE9ED7@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Add hints for invalid binary encoding names in encode/decode functions  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Add hints for invalid binary encoding names in encode/decode functions
List pgsql-hackers
> On 17 Nov 2025, at 15:59, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 11:30 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>>
>>> On 17 Nov 2025, at 15:08, Sugamoto Shinya <shinya34892@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I ordered the valid encodings alphabetically and extracted those into separate parameters.
>>
>> LGTM.  Per project style I don't think we should quote the names of encodings
>> since they are visibly not English words (see commit a243569bf65c5 which deals
>> with variable names, but I think it applies here as well)
>
> It looks like the message-style rule added in commit a243569bf65c5
> applies only to
> configuration parameter names, right? And it seems that rule was later revised
> by commit 17974ec2594. Is that correct?

Oh right, I had forgotten about that, thanks for the reminder.  The patch as
proposed is correct then.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add hints for invalid binary encoding names in encode/decode functions
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jit: fix build with LLVM-21