Re: Duplicate history file? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: Duplicate history file?
Date
Msg-id 36904a57-5668-6f7a-de92-78b7c366e65f@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Duplicate history file?  (Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Duplicate history file?
List pgsql-hackers
On 2021/06/08 18:19, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:
> I've tried your patch. Unfortunately, it didn't seem to have any good
> effect on the script I sent to reproduce the problem.

Oops! The patch forgot about history files.

I checked the attached with your repro script and it works fine.

> I understand that, as Stefan says, the test and cp commands have
> problems and should not be used for archive commands. Maybe this is not
> a big problem for the community.
> Nevertheless, even if we do not improve the feature, I think it is a
> good idea to explicitly state in the documentation that archiving may
> fail under certain conditions for new users.
>
> I'd like to hear the opinions of experts on the archive command.
>
> P.S.
> My customer's problem has already been solved, so it's ok. I've
> emailed -hackers with the aim of preventing users from encountering
> the same problem.
>
I understand that.

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Unused function parameter in get_qual_from_partbound()