Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> writes:
> On Fri, 2025-02-21 at 11:31 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... Or maybe the better answer
>> is to conclude that the whole idea of not calling
>> CommandCounterIncrement unconditionally is too fragile and not worth
>> expending brain cells on, and just rip out the if-test.
> Both the extra sentence and the simplification feel like an improvement.
> I am fine with either.
The more I think about it the more I like just getting rid of the
test. It'll likely break with every future change to this logic,
until somebody finally gives up on it; so why not now?
I'll make it so. Thanks for reviewing!
regards, tom lane
