Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.x - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vadim Mikheev
Subject Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.x
Date
Msg-id 365CC6D5.460B888A@krs.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.x  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.x  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> >>>> (3) does 6.4 support query lengths > 8192, or data blocks > 8192
> >>>> (other than large objects)?
> 
> > Sometime in the past Darren K. worked to parameterize this limit.
> 
> There has been some discussion of allowing tuples to span multiple
> disk blocks, which would remove the problem entirely, but it hasn't
> happened yet.  Maybe for 6.5?

Right now I'm rewriting HeapTuple structure and functions - for
multi-version concurrency control (MVCC). New HeapTuple:

typedef struct HeapTupleData
{    uint32              t_len;      /* length of *t_data */   ItemPointerData     t_self;     /* SelfItemPointer */
HeapTupleHeader    t_data;     /* */   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^   this is what known as HeapTuple in < 6.5
 
} HeapTupleData;

I assume that one, who would like implement blocks spanning, 
will add something to this new structure. 
I need in ~ one week, please wait.

Vadim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] temporary tables ?
Next
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] cursor and update + view