Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsutomu Yamada
Subject Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]
Date
Msg-id 36480.1262692731@srapc2360.sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PATCH] Windows x64  (Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu@sraoss.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> 2009/12/4 Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu@sraoss.co.jp>:> > Thanks to suggestion.> > I send pathces again by another mailer
forthe archive.> >> > Sorry to waste resources, below is same content that I send before.> > I have a couple of
commentsabout the first patch (I'll get to the> others later):> > config.win32.h has:> + #ifdef _MSC_VER> + /* #undef
HAVE_STDINT_H*/> + #else>   #define HAVE_STDINT_H 1> + #endif> > Is that really necessary? config.h.win32 is only used
onMSVC builds, no?
 

I also think it is unnecessary.

But pg_config.h.win32 was referred from "src/bcc32.mak".
Is Borland C++ still supported?
It is an unnecessary code if not becoming a problem to Borland.

-- 
Tsutomu Yamada
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]
Next
From: Markus Wanner
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing with concurrent sessions