Re: rint() replacement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: rint() replacement
Date
Msg-id 3639.1052533968@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: rint() replacement  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hardly worth the trouble.  The substitute implementation is small
>> and portable...

> Sorry, my paragraph was bad.  Should I remove cbrt or move it to /port?

I'd leave it sit as-is.  I don't think it's worth fooling with.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: rint() replacement
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Beta July 1