Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres - Y2K Compliant....Yes or No - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Postgres - Y2K Compliant....Yes or No
Date
Msg-id 362C1A85.EFA8F6B1@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Postgres - Y2K Compliant....Yes or No  (Tom <tom@sdf.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
>   2038 is for 31 bit (signed int) times, if we simply go to a unsigned 
> int that will extend things for another 68 years, and break very few 
> things. By 2106, I'm sure we'll have something better to do.

Hmm. I'm hoping that I'm still around in 2039 to be *really annoyed* if
I can't store my pre-1970 birthdate in Postgres ;)
               - Thomas

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind
Next
From: Paul A Vixie
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind