Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib
Date
Msg-id 362AE541.E87A72A9@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] unique indexes and pqlib  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Recent Makefile changes (was Re: unique indexes and pqlib)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > 1) Is there any reason why I can't create a unique index on an int8?
> >    It tells me this:
> >     ERROR:  Can't find a default operator class for type 20.
> int8 is new and not very thoroughly supported yet.  Probably there
> just isn't support for making an index on it (Thomas?).

I'll try to look at it. But I'm starting to get swamped with last-minute
big additions to the documentation, and will have only limited time for
other stuff.

btw, I haven't looked yet but I hope the odbc makefile stuff still can
build standalone. Hopefully we are converging on an acceptable set of
Makefiles; I'd made changes recently - which you'd noticed broke
installations which did not do major.minor version numbering on shared
libraries - in response to major breakage introduced for some other
reason which damaged installations _with_ major.minor version numbering.
Though despite appearances my response wasn't intended to rebreak the
other systems :/
                      - Tom


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Billy G. Allie"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Crashing backend!
Next
From: Frank Ridderbusch
Date:
Subject: Missing define F_OIDEQ in Sundays snapshot