Re: proposal - plpgsql unique statement id - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: proposal - plpgsql unique statement id
Date
Msg-id 3627.1548367725@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal - plpgsql unique statement id  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: proposal - plpgsql unique statement id  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: proposal - plpgsql unique statement id  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> committed

Why didn't this patch modify the dumping logic in pl_funcs.c to print
the IDs?  I'm not aware of other cases where we intentionally omit
fields from debug-support printouts.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Old protocol fastpath calls borked?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Old protocol fastpath calls borked?