Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind
Date
Msg-id 362447F1.F0EECEF3@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind  (darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain))
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > By George!  I think we've got it.  :-)
> Yup!  Great work, guys!  I like what I see in the tree so far -- just
> waiting for the transition to complete so I can use my network data
> again!  :-)

I've forgotten who volunteered to write or update docs for this. I need
to freeze the User's Guide fairly soon (~4 days?), and need to add a
mention of the CIDR data type in "datatype.sgml".

I assume that the README.inet which is currently in the tree is not an
accurate document now? I would be happy to transcribe a plain text
description into sgml, and would then expect last-minute updates to
happen in the sgml source rather than the original plain text. OK?

                    - Tom

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Matthew N. Dodd"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?
Next
From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2 ...