Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> Also happens on OpenBSD 5.8. Isn't this a classic case where memmove
>> is called for? Replacing the memcpy at line 617 with memmove makes
>> the tests run successfully, but at first glance the other two
>> instances of memcpy in run_permutation should also be changed to
>> memmove, no?
Yeah, that's clearly busted. Surprising that it has not failed on
any other platforms.
> Suggested patch attached.
Will push in a moment.
regards, tom lane