Re: Using Valgrind to detect faulty buffer accesses (no pin or buffer content lock held) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Using Valgrind to detect faulty buffer accesses (no pin or buffer content lock held)
Date
Msg-id 36041.1595126196@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using Valgrind to detect faulty buffer accesses (no pin or buffer content lock held)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: Using Valgrind to detect faulty buffer accesses (no pin or buffer content lock held)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:24 AM Anastasia Lubennikova
> <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>> Other than that, patches look good to me, so move them to "Ready For
>> Committer".

> Pushed the first patch just now, and intend to push the other one soon. Thanks!

I wonder whether skink's failure today is due to this change:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=skink&dt=2020-07-18%2018%3A01%3A10

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_subscription.subslotname is wrongly marked NOT NULL
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Using Valgrind to detect faulty buffer accesses (no pin or buffer content lock held)