Re: [HACKERS] Dynamic result sets from procedures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Dynamic result sets from procedures
Date
Msg-id 35edc9ea-9584-3f27-f230-2dd5389df88d@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Dynamic result sets from procedures  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/1/17 22:40, Robert Haas wrote:
> That seems like it is at least arguably a wire protocol break.  Today,
> if you send a string containing only one command, you will only get
> one answer.

The wire protocol already supports this.  And the wire protocol doesn't
really know about statements, only about a command string that might
contain multiple commands.  So I don't think anything would break.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Dynamic result sets from procedures
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Add some const decorations to prototypes