Re: Identifying no-op length coercions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexey Klyukin
Subject Re: Identifying no-op length coercions
Date
Msg-id 35E82720-0081-4F79-9414-1C3ECEBD8CF0@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Identifying no-op length coercions  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: Identifying no-op length coercions
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Jun 2, 2011, at 10:22 PM, Noah Misch wrote:

> Hi Alexey,
>
...
> Is your interest in cheap varchar(N)->varchar(N+M) conversions specifically, or
> in some broader application of this facility?

Exactly varchar conversions.

>
> Thanks for volunteering to review; that will be a big help.  Actually, I could
> especially use some feedback now on a related design and implementation:
>  http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20110524104029.GB18831@tornado.gateway.2wire.net
> Note that the third and fifth sentences of that description are incorrect.  The
> rest stands without them.  Even just some feedback on the mundane issue noted in
> the last paragraph would help.

Ok, I'll review it.

Thank you,
Alexey.

--
Command Prompt, Inc.                              http://www.CommandPrompt.com
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BLOB support
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: About bug #6049