Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Date
Msg-id 3581199.1659636465@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> Perhaps amcheck's verify_heapam() function can be used here. What
> could be better than exhaustively verifying that the relfrozenxid (and
> relminmxid) invariants hold for every single tuple in the table?

How much will that add to the test's runtime?  I could get behind this
idea if it's not exorbitantly expensive.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade