Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
Date
Msg-id 356957.1759179517@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL  (David Christensen <david@pgguru.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
List pgsql-hackers
David Christensen <david@pgguru.net> writes:
>> Here is v7 with a stab at docs; fairly minimal at this point, but
>> touching the two areas that are likely to need adjusting.

I did some more word-smithing on the docs and pushed it.

>> When
>> adjusting the docs for sql-select, I noticed that the grammar also
>> supports `GROUP BY ALL <grouping_elements>`, so I also added a test to
>> ensure that this syntax is explicitly supported.

+1, can't hurt.

>> (It seems like it
>> works as-is without further grammar adjustments, but I was a little
>> worried when I first saw that fact... :D)

Bison would have been vocal about it if you'd introduced any
ambiguity.  Still, I didn't feel like looking around to see if we
already covered this syntax, and I agree it's close enough to being
an issue to be worth covering.

Thanks for the patch!

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove unused parameter form find_window_run_conditions()
Next
From: David Christensen
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL