Maybe a better strategy would be to get a release out soon but not wait 6
months for another release which would contain the Win32 port and the PITR
stuff (assuming those aren't done in time for this release).
Just a thought.
andrew
Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
>> Well, I suppose that history has shown that waiting on specific
>> features causes trouble with postgresql development, but I don't see
>> why a release can't be based around waiting for feature x as long as
>> feature x is being actively worked on by trusted developers who have
>> an endgame in sight.
>
> We have been led down that garden path before, and it's been a losing
> proposition every time.
>
