vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 1:40 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> Why is a full signal needed? Seems the procsignal infrastructure should
>> suffice?
> Most of the processes have access to ProcSignal, for these processes
> printing of callstack signal was handled by using ProcSignal. Pgstat
> process & syslogger process do not have access to ProcSignal,
> multiplexing with SIGUSR1 is not possible for these processes. So I
> handled the printing of callstack for pgstat process & syslogger using
> the SIGUSR2 signal.
I'd argue that backtraces for those processes aren't really essential,
and indeed that trying to make the syslogger report its own backtrace
is damn dangerous.
(Personally, I think this whole patch fails the safety-vs-usefulness
tradeoff, but I expect I'll get shouted down.)
regards, tom lane
