Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column
Date
Msg-id 3526609.1708119890@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column
List pgsql-hackers
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> Per the recent bug report, we should probably add something like (ignored)
> after the 50 connections for role1 since they are not allowed to login so
> the value is indeed ignored.  It is ignored to zero as opposed to unlimited
> for the Superuser so maybe a different word (not allowed)?

Not sure it's worth worrying about, but if we do I'd not bother to
show the irrelevant value at all: it's just making the display wider
to little purpose.  We could make the column read as "(irrelevant)",
or leave it blank.  I'd argue the same for password expiration
time BTW.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column
Next
From: Maiquel Grassi
Date:
Subject: RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+