Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #8128: pg_dump (>= 9.1) failed while dumping a scheme named "old" from PostgreSQL 8.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #8128: pg_dump (>= 9.1) failed while dumping a scheme named "old" from PostgreSQL 8.4
Date
Msg-id 3523.1367421148@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #8128: pg_dump (>= 9.1) failed while dumping a scheme named "old" from PostgreSQL 8.4  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #8128: pg_dump (>= 9.1) failed while dumping a scheme named "old" from PostgreSQL 8.4  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> According to SQL:2003 and SQL:2008 (and the draft standard, if that
> matters) in section 5.2 of Foundation, both NEW and OLD are reserved
> words, so we're going to need to re-reserve them to comply.

We don't and won't.  There are very many other keywords that are less
reserved in Postgres than in the spec; this is a good thing.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #8128: pg_dump (>= 9.1) failed while dumping a scheme named "old" from PostgreSQL 8.4
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: corrupt pages detected by enabling checksums