Re: bugs list working??? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: bugs list working???
Date
Msg-id 3523.1080591092@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to bugs list working???  (Klint Gore <kg@kgb.une.edu.au>)
List pgsql-general
Klint Gore <kg@kgb.une.edu.au> writes:
> Anyone had any problems with the bugs mailing list?

Nope ...

> I posted a message
> to it on friday lunchtime (australian time) and didn't get anything back
> for it.  I reposted it using the web page bug report and didn't see it
> either.
> It's possible that my file was rejected due to an attachment as the test
> case in the message involves base64 data.  Is there any way of tracking
> if this is the case?

AFAIK there is no anti-base64 filter, but there is a limit of 30K or so
on message size; how big was your test case?

The majordomo 'bot can notify you when it diverts your message for
moderator approval, but this is an option in your subscription settings,
and I think Marc has it turned off by default for some reason.  You
might want to adjust your subscription options.  Send "help show" and
"help set" to majordomo@postgresql.org for instructions.  Personally
I keep all my PG subscriptions set like this:

     pgsql-general:
        Receiving       each unduplicated message
        Subscriber flags:
          noeliminatecc
          nohide
          nohidepost
          nopostblock
          prefix
          replyto
          selfcopy
          norewritefrom
          ackstall
          ackdeny
          noackpost
          ackreject

(IIRC ackstall is the setting at issue here.)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: PG vs MySQL
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Interval constant syntax, was Re: Interval & check clause