Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6
Date
Msg-id 350EA896.ADABF8C9@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6  (dg@illustra.com (David Gould))
List pgsql-hackers
> But, it may be best to leave this until after the mega patch. I am not
> sure I want to share the blame ;-).
>
> Just to fill me in, where does the mega patch fall in with the next
> release snapshot? That is, if this misses the mega patch is it waiting
> until 6.4?

I would guess that we could post a separate patch any time soon,
especially since the changes are apparently isolated to only a few
places in the code. In the last release, we posted ~7 patches, each
independent of the others, and generated on our local source trees. Each
of the patches was, however, fairly simple, quite often only one or a
few lines of change, and were intended as bug fixes. Also, they were
easily tested. In any case, at a minimum the regression test should be
run (and passed!).

                      - Tom

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Unix Domain Sockets error (was Re: [HACKERS] Alpha initdb fixed!)
Next
From: "Jackson, DeJuan"
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] First mega-patch...