Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
>
> Frankly, the voluminous docs, many adapted from the originals, seem to
> read better using "Postgres" rather than "PostgreSQL" or "Postgres95". I
> changed 'em all after defining what each is in the introduction. Would
> be a good bit of work to change them back, particularly since folks
> aren't volunteering in droves for work on documentation...
>
> - Tom
With sed doing all the work, "a good bit" would be something like
typing a couple of lines and hitting ENTER.
/* m */
