Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs
Date
Msg-id 3506449.1621452900@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> IIRC, the CF app also rejects threads on pgsql-bugs, which is even
>> more pointlessly annoying.  Couldn't we just remove that restriction
>> altogether, and allow anything posted to some pgsql list?

> It's not technically rejecting anything, it's just explicitly looking
> in -hackers and doesn't even know the others exist :)

> Changing that to look globally can certainly be done. It takes a bit
> of work I think, as there are no API endpoints today that will do
> that, but those could be added.

Ah.  Personally, I'd settle for it checking -hackers, -docs and -bugs.
Perhaps there's some case for -general as well.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rewind fails if there is a read only file.
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs