Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson
Date
Msg-id 34e972bc-6e75-0754-9e6d-cde2518773a1@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/13/21 7:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 10/13/21 5:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2021-10-13 16:06:32 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> If you prep a patch I'll test it.
>> Well, right now I'm wondering if the better fix is to just remove the whole
>> win32 block. I don't know how far back, but afaict it's not needed. Seems to
>> have been needed for narwhal at some point, according to 02b61dd08f99. But
>> narwhal is long dead.
>>
> Ok, I'll test it out.
>

confirmed that jacana doesn't need this code to build or test plperl
(all I did was change the test from win32 to win32x). There would still
be work to do to fix the contrib bool_plperl, jsonb_plperl and
hstore_plperl modules.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: relation OID in ReorderBufferToastReplace error message
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson