Re: An idle thought - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alex Hunsaker
Subject Re: An idle thought
Date
Msg-id 34d269d41003181411p1a0812cbp4cdb93cdccc5b752@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: An idle thought  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 15:07, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 16:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The VM is (a) not compressed and (b) not correctness-critical.
>> Wrong bit values don't do any serious damage.
>
> The VM cause wrong results if a bit is set that's not supposed to be --
> right? Am I missing something? How does a seq scan skip visibility
> checks and still produce right results, if it doesn't rely on the bit?

Isn't it only really used for VACUUM at this point?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: An idle thought
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: An idle thought