Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Alex Hunsaker
Subject Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date
Msg-id 34d269d41002241948o70442eb6jd78208b208bb5a77@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  (Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 20:37, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 20:19, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Seems entirely unacceptable.

> I think we will see if we can get this fixed on the Safe/perl side then.

BTW the trade off here is we revert back to sort { $a <=> $b } not
working.  That is if you could call it a trade off... The level of
breaking is not really comparable :)

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)